patches inline in mail
Andrew Morton
akpm@osdl.org
Fri Oct 1 05:33:00 GMT 2004
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> We agree. Still, I have been bitten too many times by misshandled white space
> to trust pure inlineing. Likewise on picking it up one would usually past it in
> the mail (I suppose) where as the attachment is through the mailer and less
> prone to missing a character.
>
> The best answer, I think, is attachments that show as inline AND stay that way
> on the reply.
>
> Guild lines on how to insure this are welcome.
Send angry email to everyone@mozilla.org. AFAICT it's impossible with
recent mailnews.
Slightly more on-topic:
+int do_posix_clock_process_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_process_settime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_settime(struct timespec *tp);
These should all be given static scope.
And it would be nice to structure the code so the forward decl isn't
needed, if poss.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list