[PATCH] small changes for fa_IR
Petter Reinholdtsen
pere@hungry.com
Sun Mar 21 17:34:00 GMT 2004
[Hamed Malek]
> -category "fa_IR:2002";LC_IDENTIFICATION
> +category "fa_IR:2004";LC_IDENTIFICATION
Isn't the category field supposed to include a reference to the
standard used, and not the locale name and the year of the last
change? I'm aware that almost all locales are incorrect in this
regard, but plan to change it. I suspect this is the more correct
content:
category "i18n:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION
or
category "posix:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION
I have a patch for ld-identification.c to check the content, but
haven't submitted it yet as I do not really know the allowed list of
standard references. Am I mistaken?
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list