alpha vs complex functions

Richard Henderson rth@twiddle.net
Tue Jan 13 01:58:00 GMT 2004


On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:47:55PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> So, that says that the references produced by 3.4-compiled code should have
> names like `cabsf' (that bind to a new symbol version), while referenced
> produced by 3.3-compiled code should refer specifically to the
> compatibility symbols.

Ok.  I'll experiment with the versioning and see if I can work things
around this direction.  I expect it's doable, just confusing.  ;-)


r~



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list