gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha.
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Thu Feb 26 22:07:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:36:56AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:04:22PM +0200, Balint Cristian wrote:
> > # rpm -qa | grep glibc
> > glibc-2.3.2-101
> ...
> > : relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 _dl_skip_args
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/glibc-2.3.3-200402201559/...
>
> What version of glibc are you building, exactly? I did a
> successful build of glibc cvs from Feb 20 myself...
That's weird, because Uli made _dl_skip_args attribute_relro
on Feb, 14th, and there were clearly no further changes in alpha
dl-machine.h.
/* Nonzero if we were run directly. */
unsigned int _dl_skip_args attribute_relro attribute_hidden;
/* See if we were run as a command with the executable \n\
file name as an extra leading argument. */ \n\
ldl $1, _dl_skip_args($gp) !gprel \n\
Jakub
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list