GPL/LGPL clarification

Andreas Jaeger aj@suse.de
Sun Feb 8 12:31:00 GMT 2004


"Madhvesh R S" <madhvesh.s@ap.sony.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> If i develop my own limited set of libc functions in separate
> library and exclude dependency on any glibc headers and exclude 
> dependency in linking with any glibc libraries, but for loading 
> if i make use of glibc ld.so dynamic linker, then will this cause 
> GPL or LGPL problem for my limited function library when used in
> linux instead of glibc with the applications?

Please ask on the gnu.misc.discuss newsgroup/mailing list such legal
questions,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20040208/541ecd46/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list