getconf default output
Josh Aas
josha@sgi.com
Fri Aug 13 22:50:00 GMT 2004
I would be happy to submit a patch that uses either the current
directory or known parameters. I think the latter seems like a better
idea, but whichever you think is better I will do. Thanks for your
responses. Note:
"If no operands are specified then all known variables are written in
name=value form to the standard output, one per line. Only one of
--call, --name or --standard may be specified."
Found at: http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/man/man1/getconf.html
Somebody must be doing that.
-Josh
Roland McGrath wrote:
>>Roland McGrath wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sure, send a patch to implement it.
>>
>>No, it makes no sense. You cannot print pathconf information without a
>>path. And the spec is clear that a parameter is required.
>
>
> I thought the suggestion was to give a way to list the known parameter names.
--
Josh Aas
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
Linux System Software
651-683-3068
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list