Fix: Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken

Tue Sep 16 14:12:00 GMT 2003

Hi All,

The following is an attach file fix for duplicate definitions for lo_LA locale. Re-tested with 'localedef -f UFT-8 -I lo_LA lo_LA.UTF-8', it works fine.

Thanks.

Anousak Souphavanh

-----Original Message-----
From: libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com [mailto:libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Thorsten Kukuk
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:06 AM
To: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Subject: U0EAF duplicate in lo_LA

Hi,

locales/lo_LA has a duplicate entry for U0EAF:

locales/lo_LA:610: order for `U00000EAF' already defined at locales/lo_LA:285

Does somebody knows, what the correct one is?

  Thanks,
    Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: lo_LA.txt
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20030916/aeab233d/attachment.txt>