misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Sun Nov 30 20:39:00 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Is this a speed issue? Have macros been known to be faster for this
> particular case? Or is this some weird ABI issue I am unaware of?
That code is highly optimized and there will be no speed sacrifize to
make debugging and extending easier.
- --
⧠Ulrich Drepper ⧠Red Hat, Inc. ⧠444 Castro St ⧠Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ylVt2ijCOnn/RHQRAo4ZAJ9RoGk6dQvglexzMibbGRbGIEyBngCaA+Fs
IZVfLGkRyjOBGECoNI/BBuQ=
=fWbJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list