misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Sun Nov 30 20:39:00 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aldy Hernandez wrote:

> Is this a speed issue?  Have macros been known to be faster for this
> particular case?  Or is this some weird ABI issue I am unaware of?

That code is highly optimized and there will be no speed sacrifize to
make debugging and extending easier.

- -- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ylVt2ijCOnn/RHQRAo4ZAJ9RoGk6dQvglexzMibbGRbGIEyBngCaA+Fs
IZVfLGkRyjOBGECoNI/BBuQ=
=fWbJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list