Use -fno-builtin for math tests...
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.de
Thu Nov 13 09:29:00 GMT 2003
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> As Gwenole pointed out, we do not use -fno-builtin for the math tests.
>>
>> Now the ceil test fails:
>> testing long double (without inline functions)
>> Failure: Test: ceil (0.25) == 1.0
>> Result:
>> is: 0.00000000000000000000e+00 0x0.00000000000000000000p-3
>> should be: 1.00000000000000000000e+00 0x8.00000000000000000000p-3
>> difference: nan nan
>> ulp : nan
>> max.ulp : 0.0000
>>
>> Test suite completed:
>> 2525 test cases plus 2312 tests for exception flags executed.
>> 1 errors occurred.
>>
>> Ok to commit?
>
> Shouldn't we use both -fno-builtin and -fbuiltin (ie. compile the testcases
> twice)? People will use -fbuiltin in 99.9% of cases, so it is good if that
> is tested. The drawback is that the math tests are CPU hogs both during
> compile time and when running them.
We compile them twice already - one with inline functions and one
without. We can compile them another time if people think it's
worth... I can send a patch if desired,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20031113/f560cc2e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list