libm.so vs libgcj.so

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Sun May 18 20:09:00 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jack Howarth wrote:
>    Well I was wondering more so why these symbols were weak in libm.so?
> It would seem that library should have precedence for such math related
> symbols, no?

Weak or not does not matter in the least.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+x+hd2ijCOnn/RHQRAjzQAJ9x1SJg9ascqBo2D6TltiW8x0BJbwCcDVzo
UTU4xSyOvlZfZ1+5PdqC1ic=
=htKx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list