PATCH: A symbol version bug
Jack Howarth
howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu
Thu May 15 04:39:00 GMT 2003
Alan,
Ugh. No wonder this is failing. The glibc cvs with the patch...
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00117.html
...is failing vismain.out...
`.protected' seems to be handled correctly, good!
&protinmod in main (0x10012aa4) != &protinmod in mod1 (0xffbcb34)
&protitcpt in main (0x10012a64) != &protitcpt in mod3 (0xffdf944)
&protvarinmod in main (0x100129b0) != &protitcpt in mod1 (0xffcd020)
&protvaritcpt in main (0x100129b4) != &protvaritcpt in mod3 (0xffefd70)
One thing...I built binutils 2.14.90.0.1 with the proposed bfd-base
patch...
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00425.html
...and since it passed make check I installed it and used it to build
the glibc cvs plus the base patch. I'll revert to my previous
binutils 2.14.90.0.1 without the base patch and rebuild glibc cvs
with the base patch to make sure glibc cvs is okay.
Jack
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list