[Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right
Ian Wienand
ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
Tue May 13 23:14:00 GMT 2003
>On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
> In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code. They both use
> syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer.
looks like a typo in libc to me
-i
ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10:04.000000000 +1000
+++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list 2003-05-14 09:09:40.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# File name Caller Syscall name # args Strong name Weak names
-umount2 - umount 2 __umount2 umount2
+umount2 - umount2 2 __umount2 umount2
# Whee! 64-bit systems naturally implement llseek.
llseek EXTRA lseek C:3 __libc_lseek __lseek lseek __libc_lseek64 __llseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list