[mips] ABI shouldn't depend on ISA

[Andreas Jaeger]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mar 25, 2003, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> I know there weren't comments before for this but can you add them
>> nevertheless?
>
> Err...  In what sense would these comments be different from the
> well-known stupid-comment example `i++; /* Increment i.  */'?  Or do
> you have something more interesting in mind?

It's not obvious to me whether _MIPS_ISA_MIPS32 is defined:
- iff o32 or n32 is used
- only if n32 is in use

I had something like this in mind:

> +#define _MIPS_ISA_MIPS32 6  /* Defined for code that uses o32.  */
> +#define _MIPS_ISA_MIPS64 7  /* Defined for code that uses n64.  */

Or are my comments wrong?  Then you know why they're needed ;-)

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj