tst-nanosleep, tst-clock_nanosleep Failures
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Fri Jun 13 19:30:00 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Munroe wrote:
> The nanosleep code is in the kernel is arch independent so I would expect
> this test to fail on the SMP platforms?
No problems whatsoever on the archs I test. It's in any case a grave
mistake of the kernel which must be fixed.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+6iYO2ijCOnn/RHQRAmEoAJ0ddpegzNO5Mwue5COCKxMqsXzDtQCgkr9a
Ljw/HNh02dUghnttQKitMy8=
=id33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list