Does gcc 3.4 compile glibc in CVS?

H. J. Lu hjl@lucon.org
Wed Jun 11 20:36:00 GMT 2003


On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> > When I tried gcc 3.4 from CVS to build glibc in CVS, I got
> >
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-double.out] Error 1
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-ldouble.out] Error
> > 1
> > make[3]: *** [math/xtests] Error 2
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/string/inl-tester.out] Error
> > 1
> > make[3]: *** [string/xtests] Error 2
> > make[2]: *** [xcheck] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> > make: *** [one] Error 2
> >
> > gcc gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch is ok. Is that a known problem?
> 
> The inl-tester is a known problem, I filed a bug report for it,
> 

Are those math failures also known problems? Since gcc 3.4 is quite
close now, shouldn't they be considered very serious regressions?


H.J.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list