The usage of _dl_hwcap and dl_hwcap_mask is confusing
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 13:30:00 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have changed this code now. I meant in fact to use dl_hwcap and not
dl_hwcap_mask. If the hardware is available it needs to be handled.
Regardless of whether other DSOs (or libc DSO itself) are loaded for the
appropriate subdir.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/HIHr2ijCOnn/RHQRAiVSAJ9o0QhGPrpBrkrGptOD0LNKpydHvACeKxQB
4qFdnepIloAfE6bvllw083k=
=NyFF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list