The usage of _dl_hwcap and dl_hwcap_mask is confusing

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 13:30:00 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have changed this code now.  I meant in fact to use dl_hwcap and not
dl_hwcap_mask.  If the hardware is available it needs to be handled.
Regardless of whether other DSOs (or libc DSO itself) are loaded for the
appropriate subdir.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/HIHr2ijCOnn/RHQRAiVSAJ9o0QhGPrpBrkrGptOD0LNKpydHvACeKxQB
4qFdnepIloAfE6bvllw083k=
=NyFF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list