Using GCC Bugzilla for glibc

[Andreas Jaeger]

Hi glibc developers,

the offer below by the GCC Bugzilla masters is also valid for Glibc
(confirmed privately).

I have the following questions:

- Do we want to make that move?

- Does the GCC Bugzilla meet our needs (see below for the
  restrictions)?

- Who likes to be responsible on handling glibc bugs?  Note we don't
  need folks fixing bugs, but volunteers to verify reports, assign
  them, close them, ask for more details...

Andreas

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: unknown sender
Subject: Topics
Date: no date
Size: 142
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20031218/ba9fb5dd/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Merging binutils/gdb bug databases with the gcc bugzilla
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:44:59 -0600 (CST)
Size: 2389
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20031218/ba9fb5dd/attachment-0001.eml>
-------------- next part --------------

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20031218/ba9fb5dd/attachment.sig>