[PATCH] _exit.c, exit vs. exit_group

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Wed Dec 17 18:54:00 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> Compiling with 2.6 headers, and booting into a 2.4 kernel without
> exit_group should be allowed. Although ABORT_INSTRUCTION does end the
> execution of the process, it's architecture dependant and not always a
> pretty thing.

What are you talking about?  The existing code already uses the exit
syscall in case exit_group isn't available.  All your patch does is
create a mess out of plain, simple sources.  If exit_group returns it is
with ENOSYS, nothing else.

- -- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4KYN2ijCOnn/RHQRAvXxAJ4vesLlFDQhyg5j5bJKDwl6XriDzACfc999
711E0Z91cJN8Y/wdFgAGMqc=
=Sm9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list