bug in nextafter{f,} for x86
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Tue Dec 9 11:06:00 GMT 2003
On Sat, Dec 06, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > does not in fact overflow on x86; it gets computed with
> > long double precision.
>
> Should now be fixed in CVS. Thanks,
Now it fails on i586, i686, ia64, s390x and x86-64 for me:
nextafterf+ did not overflow
nextafterf- did not overflow
nextafter+ did not overflow
nextafter- did not overflow
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list