bug in nextafter{f,} for x86

Thorsten Kukuk kukuk@suse.de
Tue Dec 9 11:06:00 GMT 2003


On Sat, Dec 06, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> > [...]
> > does not in fact overflow on x86; it gets computed with
> > long double precision.
> 
> Should now be fixed in CVS.  Thanks,

Now it fails on i586, i686, ia64, s390x and x86-64 for me:

nextafterf+ did not overflow
nextafterf- did not overflow
nextafter+ did not overflow
nextafter- did not overflow

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list