C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, H. J. Lu wrote:

> Is that a known issue? I guess I can extract a testcase out of it. I
> think it may impact people who try to use gcc 2.96 with glibc compiled
> with gcc 3.2.

This would be the broken <stdbool.h> in 2.9x.  An untested patch for that
is at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg00797.html> (without the
removal of the configure test for <stdbool.h> that should accompany it).  
Unless glibc uses or used <stdbool.h> this is irrelevant to glibc.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk