problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Thu Oct 10 15:31:00 GMT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Gall wrote:
> I guess I wasn't under the impression that all the ppc64 patches were in
> yet. I would be quite happy if that made 2.3.1.
These patches are not for 2.3.1. I'm addressing only critical issues.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9pf+22ijCOnn/RHQRAp9OAKCt3b0HKMqSd5w9xAgHHw2JrTFbxwCffYzq
5EsBiEJ0cG2Ok3CDWZ2g/AM=
=Ps2P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list