problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Thu Oct 10 15:31:00 GMT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Gall wrote:

> I guess I wasn't under the impression that all the ppc64 patches were in
> yet. I would be quite happy if that made 2.3.1.

These patches are not for 2.3.1.  I'm addressing only critical issues.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9pf+22ijCOnn/RHQRAp9OAKCt3b0HKMqSd5w9xAgHHw2JrTFbxwCffYzq
5EsBiEJ0cG2Ok3CDWZ2g/AM=
=Ps2P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list