glibc cvs broken?

[Andreas Schwab]

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

|> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
|> 
|> > Do we really want to *require* it (as opposed to just being compatible
|> > with it)?
|> 
|> There is no compatiblity possible.  The autoconf maintainers did a good
|> job in making that impossible without requiring rewrites of all the
|> autoconf files.

Don't blame the autoconf people for using internal interfaces in glibc.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."