db1 vs glibc 2.3
Roland McGrath
roland@redhat.com
Thu Oct 3 20:30:00 GMT 2002
> Doh! I see the solution now. They need to drop the use of -D_LIBC...
Yup. Something we might consider is giving gnu/stubs.h:
#ifdef _LIBC
#error the _LIBC macro must not be defined when not compiling glibc itself
#endif
since that file isn't included in the libc build, but is gotten by
basically everything in a normal build against installed headers.
Then anyone with such a bogon lying around would get a clue fast.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list