_G_IO_NO_BACKWARD_COMPAT

[Jeff Bailey]

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 04:04, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is there any to leave _G_IO_NO_BACKWARD_COMPAT undefined in a new
> > glibc port?  I believe defining this macro will make libio somewhat
> > faster.

> I can't see any reason not to define it, as you say.  That has not been
> tested so there is likely to be some bit-rot, but that is easily fixed.

Would this be useful for i386-gnu at all?

-- 
When you get to the heart,
use a knife and fork.
 - From instructions on how to eat an artichoke.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20021106/b2d0846d/attachment.sig>