[PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility

[Ulrich Drepper]

On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 08:47, Franz Sirl wrote:

> Ok, if I keep divdi3 all is well, I don't understand why, but no more 
> complaints about doubled definitions between glibc and libgcc_s linking 
> shared c++ libs.
> 
> Uli, unless 2.3 is very close, it would be nice if this could go on the branch 
> too.

What is with the files added before?  Is this in addition?  It seems to
duplicate some symbols.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20020520/93962733/attachment.sig>