Wish for 2002 ...

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

> autoconf contains no user C code, nor do I see any reason why it would
> ever include strlcat and strlcpy implementations.

Sorry, I was being horribly sloppy.  For autoconf, substitute, things
like libiberty and developers little fallback collection of functions
for use together with autoconf.  Much of this used to live in
/gd/gnu/lib back in the day.