[open-source] Re: Wish for 2002 ...
Linus Torvalds
torvalds@transmeta.com
Thu Jan 10 17:56:00 GMT 2002
On 10 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> However, it is. And unless the glibc maintainers are willing to patch
> all the programs that use it, those programs are currently not
> portable.
You're saying: other people did stupid choices, and glibc should make
stupid choices of its own to cover for those other people?
More importantly, even _if_ glibc were to make that choice, those stupid
programs would STILL not be portable.
Linus
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list