[Various] libc/2757: Multiple <bits/byteswap.h> erroneus include
Roland McGrath
roland@frob.com
Sun Jan 6 10:12:00 GMT 2002
> Shouldn't we add multiple include markers around the files in
> <bits/*>? Or what should be done?
For this one, yes. That's what's done in others that are included by more
than one header (e.g. bits/sigcontext.h). For most of these headers there
should be no need since they should be included only by their corresponding
sysdeps-independent header.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list