PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3)

[Ralf Baechle]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:39:27AM +0100, Hartvig Ekner wrote:

> Note that the issue of a "LL" will trigger bus watching activity in the
> system logic (and maybe delays?) I would personally try to avoid issuing
> "dangling" ll's in the normal case, even though the functionality would
> be ok, and in some cases they are inavoidable.

Some of the processor manuals explicitly note that the execution of a
ll instruction may not be visible at all externally.  That's the case if
the address is already in a primary cache line in exclusive (ll) or
dirty (sc) state.  That makes even if a processor supports full coherency
since there is no reason to indicate the update to any other external
agent.  Or am I missing something?

  Ralf