HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP

[Steve Munroe]

Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> I think you've been told numerous times that using #ifs to test for
> architectures is wrong.  Not only this, it's the single biggest sin.

Ok I will use __WORDSIZE and HAVE_ASM_GLOBAL_DOT_NAME where appropriate.
However I suspect that use of #ifdefs for architectures is not always a
sin. Two examples come to mind:

      ./stdlib/longlong.h
      ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/kernel-features.h

Then there are the various forms of wordsize.h on architectures that
support both 32- and 64-bit. How else will __WORDSIZE get set correctly?

Are these the only exceptions?

> - - the patch is completely out-of-data and unnecessary anyhow

OK

> - - you still haven't corrected the ChangeLog format despite being told
to

Still fighting with my editor setting and learning when tabs are permitted
and not permitted.