[wiget@pld.org.pl] libc/3237: symbol __udivdi3, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Sat Apr 20 10:02:00 GMT 2002
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 01:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I think each of the problematic platforms should analyze
> what libgcc symbols shared libraries are reexporting, then can we have
> exact numbers on how much would it grow glibc (subtracting routines
> used internally by glibc but not reexported).
I'm not so much concerned about the size. What I really don't like is
duplicating and having to track code from gcc.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20020420/693d5902/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list