[wiget@pld.org.pl] libc/3237: symbol __udivdi3, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Sat Apr 20 10:02:00 GMT 2002


On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 01:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> I think each of the problematic platforms should analyze
> what libgcc symbols shared libraries are reexporting, then can we have
> exact numbers on how much would it grow glibc (subtracting routines
> used internally by glibc but not reexported).

I'm not so much concerned about the size.  What I really don't like is
duplicating and having to track code from gcc.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20020420/693d5902/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list