binary incompatible change in libnss_*.so.2

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 13:30:00 GMT 2002


On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 13:18, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:

> Why do we have a major version number for it and increased it in the
> past for binary incopatible changes? Why is this called "libnss*" and
> not "nss*"  like Solaris does?

Because of the build process.  That's even documented somewhere.

> The reason (you self explained it!) is,
> that in this way it is possible to link against this libraries. Why
> did you change your opinium about this?

Not from the outside.  These are clearly internal interfaces.

> Yes, and the result is that you are not able to support NIS+ with it.

OK, then find another way.  But don't use internal symbols.  Stop
arguing and fix your code.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20020409/7b7ab170/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list