[testcase] Simplified testcases why current gcc trunk cannot compile glibc

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Oct 15 13:27:00 GMT 2001


On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:18:21PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Why not support it more directly?  That is, something in `asm' syntax that
> constitutes a proper reference to the function so that the compiler neither
> warns about it being unused nor fails to emit the code.  

Hmm.  Changing extended asms to accept arguments outside of functions
wouldn't be a bad idea anyway -- lots of times we just want constant
integer arguments such as offsetoff(my_struct, member).


r~



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list