[testcase] Simplified testcases why current gcc trunk cannot compile glibc
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Oct 15 13:27:00 GMT 2001
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:18:21PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Why not support it more directly? That is, something in `asm' syntax that
> constitutes a proper reference to the function so that the compiler neither
> warns about it being unused nor fails to emit the code.
Hmm. Changing extended asms to accept arguments outside of functions
wouldn't be a bad idea anyway -- lots of times we just want constant
integer arguments such as offsetoff(my_struct, member).
r~
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list