[patch] errno.texi: Clarify some GNU extensions

[Ulrich Drepper]

Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:

> Then why not follow the rest of the documentation and label the spec
> (like is done for BSD, SYSV, POSIX, etc.)? Does it really hurt to be
> more clear, especially in the section that actually documents this
> interface? And shouldn't examples be particularly clear?

I'm sick of having to defend every decision for you.  Your patch would
create unnecessary inconsistencies.  Everything is already said.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------