using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler

[Ulrich Drepper]

Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> writes:

> True, but using Solaris as a precedent actually argues for something
> like Bruno's patch, because because Solaris's headers work correctly
> and sanely only with Sun's compilers.

Wrong.  This just means the fixincludes isn't doing its job and write
appropriate wrappers for the headers which use gcc's way of renaming.

> I'm sympathetic to your desire to avoid mucking with the namespace,
> but disabling LFS is pretty extreme.  Most application programmers
> want functionality more than they want pedantic POSIX support.

Then tell them to use a reasonable compiler.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------