More manual patches

[Andreas Schwab]

Bruce <bruce@puremagic.com> writes:

|> Index: manual/argp.texi
|> ===================================================================
|> RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/manual/argp.texi,v
|> retrieving revision 2.12
|> diff -u -r2.12 argp.texi
|> --- argp.texi	2000/12/28 08:40:50	2.12
|> +++ argp.texi	2001/05/17 07:49:05
|> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@
|>  this flag is set, @code{ARGP_PARSE_ARGV0} is ignored, as @code{argv[0]}
|>  is used as the program name in the error messages.  This flag implies
|>  @code{ARGP_NO_EXIT} (on the assumption that silent exiting upon errors
|> -is bad behaviour).
|> +is bad behavior).

AFAIK this (and some of the other changes) is british vs. american
spelling.  What should be the standard in the manual?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5