GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Sat Jun 30 16:17:00 GMT 2001
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:06:09AM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >
> > Could someone please provide a complete, tested patch for 2.95.3 to allow
>
> What do you need 2.95.3 for? I don't use it myself.
Until the issues from these threads are resolved, 2.95.3 plus a small
patch should be a more conservative solution for reliably building glibc
than 3.0. AFAIK both
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01187.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg00748.html
are needed, but there should be a properly packaged and tested patch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list