Collation of underline U0005F correct?

[Ulrich Drepper]

Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

> But looking at Unicode, I noticed the Unicode collation algorithm
> (http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr10/) and found at
> http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr10/allkeys.txt this line:

The Unicode collation has not much to do with the ISO 14651 collation.
They try to be compatible but there is no such requirement.

Having said that I don't say the 14651 data we currently use is
correct.  In fact, if you'd look at the to-do list you'd see updating
the tables as one of the items.  But this is a major step and requires
a lot of work.

I really don't want to spend any time on the current tables.  They
work fine so far and nobody ever guaranteed compliance with the
arbitrary decisions the Unicode people made.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------