[PATCH] Next attempt on the gcc3 vs glibc2.2.4 patch

[Ulrich Drepper]

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> I thought it was always true regardless of dlopening libgcc_s.so.1 or
> not.

I don't understand.  I was talking about using exactly one
implementation, the one from libgcc_s.

> 1. Jakub's patch doesn't do that.

I know.

> 2. This scheme will only work with symbol versioning. Are you proposing
> it as the solution to gcc? Personally, I am all for it. But what about
> the other gcc targets which don't have symbol versioning?

What has this to do with glibc?  We are only talking about existing
port of glibc.  They are all ELF and use symbol versioning.  The
libgcc_s on these targets also use symbol versioning.  No problem.

> Even if we don't care those targets, we may need to do something in
> gcc for glibc to get it to work.

The tests are in glibc, not in libgcc_s.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------