glibc 2.2.3 problems when compiling on RH 7.1
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Thu Apr 19 14:38:00 GMT 2001
Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@winds.org> writes:
> I believe that's mainly because RedHat included a beta
> version of 2.2.3 that had the extra symbol defined that is now not defined
> anymore, and several libraries were compiled using that symbol.
No, that's not the problem. You are not overwriting once libc object
while a different, older one gets used. It's entirely your fault.
> Until 7.1, I've never had a problem installing glibc on RedHat.
Which just proves my point: the installation is getting more and more
complicated so that people not directly involved in the development
don't know all the details.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list