Patch for undefined behaviour in gcc
Neil Booth
NeilB@earthling.net
Fri Oct 27 10:03:00 GMT 2000
Roland McGrath wrote:-
> You have missed the fundamental point.
>
> The implementation of glibc uses GCC extensions. There is no reason it
> should not. If you want these warnings in your own code, fine. But they
> should not be reported for code in system headers, just like many other
> warnings are not.
Development versions of GCC suppress all warnings in system headers,
for this very reason.
Neil.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list