LinuxThreads cancellation bug.

[Ulrich Drepper]

Kaz Kylheku <kaz@ashi.footprints.net> writes:

> I believe that it is sufficient, simply because that extrication
> pointer is not registered if the thread's cancelation is disabled,
> so kill() will be called rather than restart(). The thread's signal
> handler will note that cancelation is disabled and not do anything.

I'm not convinced at all.  If it's working it is far too complicated.
All these stupid signal sending can have some effects somewhere else.

> How about something like:

I've changed it like this as this was what I initially envisioned.  Thanks,

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------