Recommending gcc 2.95.1
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Mon Jan 10 03:23:00 GMT 2000
On Sun, Jan 09, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >>>>> Martin v Loewis writes:
>
> > In INSTALL of glibc 2.1.3pre1, the recommended gcc version is
> > 2.95.1. Should this be updated to 2.95.2, or is there some problem
> > with 2.95.2?
> It should be updated.
Does anybody know the solution how to compile glibc 2.1.3pre1 on Alpha
with gcc 2.95.2 ?
I always get:
In file included from ../include/bits/cmathcalls.h:1,
from ../math/complex.h:88,
from ../include/complex.h:1,
from conj.c:21:
../math/bits/cmathcalls.h: In function `cimagf':
../math/bits/cmathcalls.h:139: Unable to access imaginary part of complex value in a hard register on this target
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list