(3)Test report glibc-2.1.90(Re: (2)Test report glibc-2.1.90
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Wed Feb 23 01:50:00 GMT 2000
Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui@highway.ne.jp> writes:
|> From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
|> > The problem is that the broken make creates a wrong order for one list
|> > in that file. The list has to be recreated with the new make - which
|> > happens if you remove the file.
|>
|> Thanks,Andreas.
|> I unstoot this problem,I have a clear.
|> I have found the other problem. The sln gave me SegFault.
|>
|> it's used gcc-2.95.2 and gcc-2.96.
|> Both recompiled glibc put Segfault when installing.
|> Look at the result and backtrace.
Have you tried updating binutils?
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list