[rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?

[Ben Collins]

On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:18:33AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > Obviously I can't know everything. If this is answered, then I'll
> > look. No need for belittling comments.
> 
> But you expect me to waste my time?

I'm fairly certain that I did not send that email directly to you. If
it's a waste of your time, ignore it.

> > So why is it there in the linuxthreads used with glibc 2.2 (and yes,
> > this is using the glibc-linuxthreads-2.2.tar.gz)?
> 
> The program is broken.  It must fail.

Well, since you've taken the time to declare the FAQ to be incorrect,
and the test case to be incorrect aswell, could you at the very least
point out how it is incorrect?

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'