[Various] libc/1864: strtol does not return 0xFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF when fed "0xFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF"

[Andreas Jaeger]

We've received the appended bug report.  Can anybody clarify this,
please?

If I understand this correctly, the basic question is whether strtol
handles:
Numbers > 0x8000000000000000 as a negative number - or not.

Btw. this works with strtoul.  I've added this as a testcase to
tst-strtol and tst-strtoll.  Please tell me if the tests cases are
correct (in this case the report is wrong) - or wrong and we need to
fix strtol/strtoll.

Andreas

2000-08-21  Andreas Jaeger  <aj@suse.de>

	* stdlib/tst-strtol.c: Add test for 0xFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF (from PR
	libc/1864).
	* stdlib/tst-strtoll.c: Likewise.

============================================================
Index: stdlib/tst-strtol.c
--- stdlib/tst-strtol.c	2000/05/23 08:42:56	1.18
+++ stdlib/tst-strtol.c	2000/08/21 15:37:04
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
   {"yz!", 34 * 36 + 35, 36, '!', 0},
   {"-yz", -(34*36 + 35), 36, 0, 0},
   {"GhI4", ((16*20 + 17)*20 + 18)*20 + 4, 20, 0, 0},
-  
+
   /* extremes... */
 #if LONG_MAX == 0x7fffffff
   {"2147483647", 2147483647, 0, 0, 0},
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
   {"-9223372036854775808", -9223372036854775808, 0, 0, 0},
   {"-9223372036854775809", -9223372036854775808, 0, 0, ERANGE},
   {"0x112233445566778899z", 9223372036854775807, 16, 'z', ERANGE},
+  {"0xFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF" , 9223372036854775807, 0, 0, ERANGE},
 #endif
   {NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0},
 
============================================================
Index: stdlib/tst-strtoll.c
--- stdlib/tst-strtoll.c	2000/05/23 08:42:56	1.3
+++ stdlib/tst-strtoll.c	2000/08/21 15:37:04
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
   {"-9223372036854775808", -9223372036854775807ll - 1, 0, 0, 0},
   {"-9223372036854775809", -9223372036854775807ll - 1, 0, 0, ERANGE},
   {"0x112233445566778899z", 9223372036854775807ll, 16, 'z', ERANGE},
+  {"0xFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF" , 9223372036854775807ll, 0, 0, ERANGE},
   {NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0},
 
   /* Then unsigned.  */