__STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91

Andreas Jaeger aj@suse.de
Sun Aug 13 22:55:00 GMT 2000


>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:

Uli> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>> Uli, did you ask Michael Everson?

Uli> No.  Why?

The question is which value should the constant have?  January 2000 is
the best value I'm aware off - but I'm not sure if it's the right one.

>> For now I propose to add January 2000.
>> 
>> Ok, to commit?  Or shall I contact Michael first?

Uli> I've applied the (modified) patch.  Thanks,
Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list