__STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.de
Sun Aug 13 22:55:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:
Uli> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>> Uli, did you ask Michael Everson?
Uli> No. Why?
The question is which value should the constant have? January 2000 is
the best value I'm aware off - but I'm not sure if it's the right one.
>> For now I propose to add January 2000.
>>
>> Ok, to commit? Or shall I contact Michael first?
Uli> I've applied the (modified) patch. Thanks,
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list