[Michael Deutschmann <michael@talamasca.wkpowerlink.com>] libc/1424: llseek symbol is attractive nuisance
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Thu Nov 25 07:35:00 GMT 1999
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
|> What do you think of the appended bug report?
|>
|> Should we remove llseek for glibc 2.2?
-Wimplicit is your friend. There are _many_ other functions in glibc that
are not declared by default (all GNU extensions). A program that compiles
and links successfully is not necessarily correct.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list