[Michael Deutschmann <michael@talamasca.wkpowerlink.com>] libc/1424: llseek symbol is attractive nuisance

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Thu Nov 25 07:35:00 GMT 1999


Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

|> What do you think of the appended bug report?
|> 
|> Should we remove llseek for glibc 2.2?

-Wimplicit is your friend.  There are _many_ other functions in glibc that
are not declared by default (all GNU extensions).  A program that compiles
and links successfully is not necessarily correct.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list