glibc 2.0.112

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 05:40:28PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>  There are some failures which are not directly related to the GNU libc:
> -- Some compiler produce buggy code.  The egcs 1.1 release should be ok.  gcc
> -  2.8.1 might cause some failures, gcc 2.7.2.x is so buggy, that explicit
> -  checks have been used so that you can't build with it.
> +- Some compiler produce buggy code.  The egcs 1.1 release should be ok
> +  (besides some singe precision complex problems on Alpha).  gcc 2.8.1 might
> +  cause some failures, gcc 2.7.2.x is so buggy, that explicit checks have
> +  been used so that you can't build with it.

Meaningless gramatical nit - shouldn't that be compilers?


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|     CMU, CS class of 2002      |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __   Part-Time Systems Programmer  |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |        drow@cs.cmu.edu         |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/