[OT] Re: gdb vs. glibc (glibc-devel-2.0.7-19, aka RedHat 5.1
Andreas Jaeger
aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Wed Oct 7 09:30:00 GMT 1998
>>>>> Philip Blundell writes:
>> So you pretend to change the kernel or glibc to match the includes of an
>> application?
P> The application is only doing what it's supposed to do. The problem is that
P> glibc refers to a file that doesn't exist any more. I guess <sys/debugreg.h>
P> needs decoupling from the kernel headers too.
This has been done already for glibc 2.1 and I've asked Ulrich Drepper
to include that patch for glibc 2.0.7-final also.
Let's close this discussion which is offtopic to linux-kernel - or
continue it on glibc lists (see Reply-To!).
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list