[OT] Re: gdb vs. glibc (glibc-devel-2.0.7-19, aka RedHat 5.1

Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Wed Oct 7 09:30:00 GMT 1998


>>>>> Philip Blundell writes:

>> So you pretend to change the kernel or glibc to match the includes of an
>> application?

P> The application is only doing what it's supposed to do.  The problem is that 
P> glibc refers to a file that doesn't exist any more.  I guess <sys/debugreg.h> 
P> needs decoupling from the kernel headers too.

This has been done already for glibc 2.1 and I've asked Ulrich Drepper 
to include that patch for glibc 2.0.7-final also.

Let's close this discussion which is offtopic to linux-kernel - or
continue it on glibc lists (see Reply-To!).

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger   aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de    jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
  for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list